College Football
Book Conviction TotalsWhat Book Conviction measures — feeds, filters and scoring
A book that holds most of the money on one side should move its number toward that side. When it does the opposite — shading the price to make the popular side cheaper while already carrying that exposure — it is telling you its own number disagrees with its customers. That is what Book Conviction measures: how hard a book is leaning against its own money, priced in the margins that actually decide games.
- Action Network — consensus % of money and % of tickets, plus a timestamped history of both the number and the price, at seven books individually rather than only the consensus.
- DraftKings — DraftKings' own handle % and bet %, independent of the consensus above, which is what makes agreement between them worth anything.
- Pinnacle — the sharp reference price. It takes sharp action and moves on it instead of shading to balance a public book's exposure, so it answers a different question: not where the money is, but where the number should be.
Official picks — 2.5+
Temple Owls at Toledo Rockets
OVER holds 63% of the money (Action Network) and 86% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 48.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 4 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 40.5h ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
Eastern Michigan Eagles at Wisconsin Badgers
OVER holds 84% of the money (Action Network) and 60% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 44.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 3 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 43.9h ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
SMU Mustangs at Louisville Cardinals
OVER holds 66% of the money (Action Network) and 64% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 58.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers at Delaware Fightin Blue Hens
OVER holds 65% of the money (Action Network) and 86% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 56.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 4 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 15.6h ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
Akron Zips at Minnesota Golden Gophers
OVER holds 60% of the money (Action Network) and 71% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 48.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 5 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 42m ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
Kent State Golden Flashes at Ohio State Buckeyes
OVER holds 87% of the money (Action Network) and 86% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 58.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 5 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 1h ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
Kentucky Wildcats at Texas A&M Aggies
OVER holds 84% of the money (Action Network) and 85% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 49.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
UTEP Miners at Michigan Wolverines
OVER holds 80% of the money (Action Network) and 76% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 48.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. 3 books moved it within half an hour of each other, 63.5h ago — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting.
Bowling Green Falcons at Iowa State Cyclones
OVER holds 84% of the money (Action Network) and 61% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing Over 43.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Results — totals
| Matchup | Market | Pick | CLV | Final | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC @ DEL | total | UNDER 56.5 | +0 | 14-22 | win |
| AKR @ MINN | total | UNDER 48.5 | +0 | 7-41 | win |
| BGSU @ ISU | total | UNDER 43.5 | +0 | 7-55 | loss |
| KENT @ OSU | total | UNDER 58.5 | +0 | 3-59 | loss |
| EMU @ WIS | total | UNDER 44.5 | +0 | 10-54 | loss |
| TEM @ TOL | total | UNDER 48.5 | +0 | 48-49 | loss |
| SMU @ LOU | total | UNDER 58.5 | +0 | 31-41 | loss |
| UK @ TA&M | total | UNDER 49.5 | +1 | 31-21 | loss |
| UTEP @ MICH | total | UNDER 48.5 | +0 | 17-52 | loss |
Graded against the number frozen before kickoff, not a later one. This slate: 2W - 7L (22%) · 1 of 9 beat the close, averaging +0.11 points.
By conviction
| Band | Conviction | Picks | Record | Beat the close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Official | 2.5 + | 12 | 4W - 8L (33%) | 1/12 (+0.08) |
| Watch | 2.0 – 2.5 | 0 | — | — |
| Noted | under 2.0 | 0 | — | — |
2 earlier picks predate the score and sit in no band. They were not weak, they were unscored — and they are most of the graded history so far, which is why the bands below are still mostly empty.
Official picks are 2.5 and above. Everything else is still listed and still graded — closing line value is readable within hours, so if conviction means anything the higher bands should beat the close more often, and that is the test. Win/loss at this volume would take seasons to say the same thing.
Full board — totals
| Matchup | ET | Bets | Open | Now | Money on | AN $% | AN T% | DK $% | DK T% | 7d | 3d | 1d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSU @ MISS | 7:30 | 97,051 | 57.5 | 58.5 | OVER | 50 | 48 | — | — | +1 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| SMU @ LOU | 3:30 | 61,543 | 56.5 | 58.5 | OVER | 66 | 57 | 64 | 85 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 3.9 FINAL |
| FLA @ AUB | 7:00 | 55,293 | 53.5 | 53.5 | OVER | 62 | 87 | — | — | +0.5 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| UGA @ ARK | 12:00 | 49,401 | 55.5 | 54.5 | OVER | 70 | 68 | 92 | 95 | +0.5 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| MSST @ SC | 4:15 | 46,786 | 54.5 | 59.5 | OVER | 50 | 46 | — | — | +5 | +1 | +1 | FINAL |
| UNC @ CLEM | 12:00 | 44,156 | 44.5 | 44.5 | OVER | 78 | 89 | — | — | 0 | +1 | +1 | FINAL |
| FSU @ BAMA | 3:30 | 40,500 | 52.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 78 | 79 | 91 | 96 | -1.5 | +1 | 0 | FINAL |
| USC @ RUT | 3:30 | 32,468 | 55.5 | 58.5 | UNDER | 66 | 54 | 4 | 24 | +3 | -1 | +1 | FINAL |
| UK @ TA&M | 3:30 | 29,600 | 48.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 84 | 77 | 85 | 86 | +1 | -1 | 0 | 3.4 FINAL |
| VT @ UMD | 7:30 | 28,989 | 53.5 | 53.5 | OVER | 87 | 87 | — | — | +3.5 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| ASU @ KU | 12:00 | 25,864 | 56.5 | 50.5 | OVER | 72 | 71 | — | — | -6 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| UNT @ TXST | 12:00 | 24,380 | 63.5 | 62.5 | OVER | 53 | 48 | — | — | -1 | -1 | 0 | FINAL |
| NCST @ VAN | 12:45 | 21,795 | 51.5 | 50.5 | OVER | 77 | 81 | 52 | 87 | -1 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| UNM @ OU | 7:30 | 20,381 | 49.5 | 45.5 | OVER | 91 | 81 | — | — | -4 | -1 | 0 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| WVU @ UVA | 7:30 | 19,321 | 50.5 | 51.5 | OVER | 76 | 89 | — | — | -2 | -2 | -2 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| COLO @ NW | 7:30 | 18,917 | 45.5 | 47.5 | OVER | 77 | 77 | — | — | +2 | -1 | 0 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| CC @ DEL | 11:30 | 18,594 | 57.5 | 56.5 | OVER | 65 | 62 | 86 | 69 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 3.6 FINAL |
| STAN @ DUKE | 4:00 | 18,377 | 50.5 | 51.5 | OVER | 85 | 82 | — | — | +1 | +1 | +1 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| KENT @ OSU | 12:00 | 17,614 | 56.5 | 58.5 | OVER | 87 | 78 | 86 | 89 | +2 | -1 | -1 | 3.5 FINAL |
| UTEP @ MICH | 3:30 | 17,291 | 48.5 | 48.5 | OVER | 80 | 82 | 76 | 74 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 3.3 FINAL |
| BYU @ CSU | 7:30 | 17,059 | 51.5 | 54.5 | OVER | 85 | 84 | — | — | +3 | +2 | +2 | FINAL |
| MSU @ ND | 7:30 | 16,049 | 52.5 | 51.5 | OVER | 70 | 78 | — | — | -1.5 | -1 | -1 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| WMU @ RICE | 7:00 | 15,560 | 49.5 | 43.5 | OVER | 87 | 90 | — | — | -6 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| TULN @ KSU | 12:00 | 15,302 | 50.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 81 | 81 | 61 | 90 | -1 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| LT @ BAY | 4:00 | 15,211 | 55.5 | 50.5 | OVER | 60 | 79 | — | — | -5 | -3 | +1 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| USU @ UTAH | 3:30 | 14,883 | 57.5 | 55.5 | OVER | 60 | 55 | 43 | 72 | -2 | -1 | -1 | FINAL |
| WKU @ IU | 4:00 | 14,242 | 59.5 | 58.5 | OVER | 70 | 61 | — | — | -1 | -2 | -2 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| OHIO @ USA | 7:00 | 12,970 | 53.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 92 | 91 | — | — | -4 | 0 | +1 | FINAL |
| BGSU @ ISU | 12:00 | 11,985 | 47.5 | 43.5 | OVER | 84 | 86 | 61 | 86 | -4 | -1 | 0 | 2.8 FINAL |
| M-OH @ CIN | 3:30 | 11,753 | 48.5 | 50.5 | OVER | 75 | 68 | 95 | 83 | +2 | +1 | +1 | FINAL |
| FIU @ FAU | 6:00 | 10,385 | 59.5 | 62.5 | OVER | 57 | 55 | 76 | 58 | +3 | 0 | 0 | FINAL |
| EMU @ WIS | 12:30 | 10,016 | 47.5 | 44.5 | OVER | 84 | 86 | 60 | 81 | -3 | -1 | 0 | 4.3 FINAL |
| GAST @ UCF | 7:00 | 9,910 | 49.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 56 | 56 | — | — | 0 | -1 | 0 | FINAL |
| AKR @ MINN | 12:00 | 9,229 | 47.5 | 48.5 | OVER | 60 | 73 | 71 | 68 | +1 | -1 | -1 | 3.6 FINAL |
| TEM @ TOL | 3:00 | 9,178 | 52.5 | 48.5 | OVER | 63 | 79 | 86 | 82 | -4 | -2 | -1 | 5.3 FINAL |
| TROY @ MIZ | 7:00 | 9,158 | 49.5 | 49.5 | OVER | 76 | 75 | — | — | 0 | 0 | -1 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| WYO @ CMU | 1:00 | 8,542 | 43.5 | 39.5 | OVER | 75 | 83 | 31 | 72 | -4 | 0 | +1 | FINAL |
| KENN @ TENN | 7:45 | 8,390 | 60.5 | 60.5 | OVER | 60 | 53 | — | — | 0 | +1 | 0 | FINAL |
| BUFF @ PSU | 12:00 | 8,007 | 48.5 | 47.5 | OVER | 89 | 86 | — | — | -1 | -2 | -2 | unconfirmed FINAL |
Movement columns are the change in the total over each window. Teal = moved against the money (the signal); orange = moved with it. AN = Action Network consensus, DK = DraftKings. Percentages are for the side named in “Money on”.
How much to trust it
- Most days produce nothing, and that is the screen working. Thin markets are dropped before they are screened, both money feeds have to agree, and the line has to have moved against that money. A light board clears none of that: one recent Friday had four games and produced no pick at all. A screen that always finds something is not a screen.
- The edge is modest. The underlying move — reverse line movement — is a real but heavily degraded signal — books price it in now. This screen finds where a market is behaving oddly; it does not establish that the odd behaviour is wrong.
- Splits are a snapshot, not a history. Percentages are read at generation time and will drift before kickoff.
- Ticket shape can conflict. Where one feed shows money concentrated in few tickets and the other shows it spread across many, the sharp reading is weaker. The per-game cards show both so the disagreement stays visible.
- Totals move spreads. A falling total mechanically compresses a spread, so part of a spread move can be a total move wearing a disguise.
- Check the news. A line moving against the money is often just an injury the percentages have not caught up with yet.