Sharp Plays
Betting Intelligence for the Masses

College Football

Book Conviction Spreads
SpreadsTotals →
Monday, October 19, 2026  ·  generated 8:00 AM ET  ·  Download PDF
This Slate · 2.5+
—
←
Monday, October 19, 2026
0 games screened
→
Official Picks · 2.5+
23W - 14L (62%)
Beat the Close
13/37  (+0.35 pts)
0
Games screened
0
Official picks
0
Still open
0
Locked at kickoff
What Book Conviction measures — feeds, filters and scoring

A book that holds most of the money on one side should move its number toward that side. When it does the opposite — shading the price to make the popular side cheaper while already carrying that exposure — it is telling you its own number disagrees with its customers. That is what Book Conviction measures: how hard a book is leaning against its own money, priced in the margins that actually decide games.

Method. Three free feeds, none of them paid for and none of them interchangeable:
  • Action Network — consensus % of money and % of tickets, plus a timestamped history of both the number and the price, at seven books individually rather than only the consensus.
  • DraftKings — DraftKings' own handle % and bet %, independent of the consensus above, which is what makes agreement between them worth anything.
  • Pinnacle — the sharp reference price. It takes sharp action and moves on it instead of shading to balance a public book's exposure, so it answers a different question: not where the money is, but where the number should be.
What gets flagged. A game needs at least 8,000 tracked bets — on thin markets the two splits feeds disagree by a median of roughly 30 points of money share, so their percentages there cannot be trusted — and both feeds must agree on which side holds the money, with at least 60% of the money on it. At 51/49 a book holds no meaningful exposure either way: it is balanced and collecting vig from both sides, so moving the number “against the money” there is not a statement, it is noise. Then either the number moved against that money in the last 3 days, or the price did by at least half a point's worth: a book shades the vig before it moves the line, and a spread sitting still at −3 while the price runs −110 to −125 has moved. What scores it. The move is weighted by the key numbers it touched, because giving up 3 is not the same as drifting through 10. It is then scaled by how lopsided the money is, how much of it there is, whether the play is getting a better number than Pinnacle, and whether several books moved together within half an hour — the market being hit in parallel rather than one book drifting. That produces the 0–10 Conviction score. 2.5 and above is an official pick; everything below is listed and graded but kept out of the headline record.

Official picks — 2.5+

No official pick today, and nothing cleared both filters. On a light board that is the usual outcome — thin markets are dropped before they are screened, and the two money feeds have to agree before anything is flagged at all.

Results — spreads

No pick was recorded on this slate.

Full board — spreads

MatchupETBetsOpenNowMoney onAN $%AN T%DK $%DK T%7d3d1dKey

Movement columns are the change in the home spread over each window. Teal = moved against the money (the signal); orange = moved with it. AN = Action Network consensus, DK = DraftKings. Percentages are for the side named in “Money on”.

How much to trust it