College Football
Book Conviction SpreadsWhat Book Conviction measures — feeds, filters and scoring
A book that holds most of the money on one side should move its number toward that side. When it does the opposite — shading the price to make the popular side cheaper while already carrying that exposure — it is telling you its own number disagrees with its customers. That is what Book Conviction measures: how hard a book is leaning against its own money, priced in the margins that actually decide games.
- Action Network — consensus % of money and % of tickets, plus a timestamped history of both the number and the price, at seven books individually rather than only the consensus.
- VSiN — DraftKings' own handle % and bet %, independent of the consensus above, which is what makes agreement between them worth anything.
- Pinnacle — the sharp reference price. It takes sharp action and moves on it instead of shading to balance a public book's exposure, so it answers a different question: not where the money is, but where the number should be.
Official picks — 2.5+
Tulsa Golden Hurricane at Sam Houston State Bearkats
TLSA holds 66% of the money (Action Network) and 63% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing TLSA -12.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs at LSU Tigers
LSU holds 91% of the money (Action Network) and 96% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing LSU -34.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Navy Midshipmen at Florida Atlantic Owls
NAVY holds 61% of the money (Action Network) and 72% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 0.5 pts the other way. The book is pricing NAVY -4 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. The move touched 4 — a margin college football lands on more often than the numbers either side.
Georgia Southern Eagles at Clemson Tigers
CLEM holds 63% of the money (Action Network) and 85% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing CLEM -19.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Also flagged — below 2.5
Real signals that did not reach the official line. Listed and graded, but they do not count towards the headline record.
Memphis Tigers at Boise State Broncos
MEM holds 65% of the money (Action Network) and 58% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 1 pt the other way. The book is pricing MEM +9.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Ohio State Buckeyes at Texas Longhorns
OSU holds 64% of the money (Action Network) and 57% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 0.5 pts the other way. The book is pricing OSU +2 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money. The move touched 2 — a margin college football lands on more often than the numbers either side.
Buffalo Bulls at Florida International Panthers
BUFF holds 70% of the money (Action Network) and 75% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 2 pts the other way. The book is pricing BUFF +8.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Oklahoma Sooners at Michigan Wolverines
OU holds 81% of the money (Action Network) and 63% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 0.5 pts the other way. The book is pricing OU -5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Wake Forest Demon Deacons at Purdue Boilermakers
PUR holds 51% of the money (Action Network) and 77% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 0.5 pts the other way. The book is pricing PUR +3 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Old Dominion Monarchs at Virginia Tech Hokies
VT holds 79% of the money (Action Network) and 73% at DraftKings, yet the number moved 0.5 pts the other way. The book is pricing VT -18.5 cheaper while already holding most of that side's money.
Results — spreads
| Matchup | Market | Pick | CLV | Final | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODU @ VT | spread | ODU +18.5 | — | 21-44 | loss |
| OU @ MICH | spread | MICH +5 | — | 10-17 | win |
| WF @ PUR | spread | WF -3 | — | 38-36 | loss |
| BUFF @ FIU | spread | FIU -8.5 | +0 | 20-33 | win |
| MEM @ BOISE | spread | BOISE -9.5 | +0 | 20-38 | win |
| TLSA @ SHSU | spread | SHSU +12.5 | -0.5 | 23-17 | win |
| GASO @ CLEM | spread | GASO +19.5 | +0 | 7-22 | win |
| LT @ LSU | spread | LT +34.5 | +0 | 14-45 | win |
| NAVY @ FAU | spread | FAU +4 | +0 | 30-38 | win |
| OSU @ TEX | spread | TEX -2 | +0 | 23-24 | loss |
Graded against the number frozen before kickoff, not a later one. This slate: 7W - 3L (70%) · 0 of 7 beat the close, averaging -0.07 points.
By conviction
| Band | Conviction | Picks | Record | Beat the close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Official | 2.5 + | 4 | 4W - 0L (100%) | 0/4 (-0.12) |
| Watch | 2.0 – 2.5 | 1 | 1W - 0L (100%) | 0/1 (+0) |
| Noted | under 2.0 | 2 | 1W - 1L (50%) | 0/2 (+0) |
6 earlier picks predate the score and sit in no band. They were not weak, they were unscored — and they are most of the graded history so far, which is why the bands below are still mostly empty.
Official picks are 2.5 and above. Everything else is still listed and still graded — closing line value is readable within hours, so if conviction means anything the higher bands should beat the close more often, and that is the test. Win/loss at this volume would take seasons to say the same thing.
Full board — spreads
| Matchup | ET | Bets | Open | Now | Money on | AN $% | AN T% | DK $% | DK T% | 7d | 3d | 1d | Key | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSU @ TEX | 7:30 | 92,860 | -2.5 | -2 | OSU | 64 | 65 | 57 | 56 | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 2 | 1.9 FINAL |
| OU @ MICH | 12:00 | 86,438 | -2.5 | 5 | OU | 81 | 79 | 63 | 81 | +6.5 | -0.5 | -0.5 | — | 0.0 FINAL |
| BAMA @ UK | 3:30 | 60,796 | 10.5 | 9 | BAMA | 66 | 79 | 49 | 65 | -1.5 | -1.5 | -1 | 10 | FINAL |
| TENN @ GT | 7:00 | 40,419 | 8.5 | 12.5 | TENN | 65 | 72 | 54 | 70 | +0.5 | 0 | +0.5 | — | FINAL |
| ORE @ OKST | 12:00 | 36,840 | 17.5 | 23.5 | ORE | 78 | 68 | 92 | 88 | +4.5 | +1 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| MSST @ MINN | 3:30 | 36,032 | -2.5 | 1.5 | MSST | 82 | 77 | 23 | 42 | +3.5 | +3 | +2.5 | — | FINAL |
| ARI @ BYU | 3:30 | 35,149 | -6.5 | -6.5 | BYU | 60 | 69 | 50 | 71 | +2 | +1 | +1 | 7 | FINAL |
| ASU @ TA&M | 12:00 | 32,761 | -14.5 | -14.5 | ASU | 52 | 36 | 67 | 38 | +0.5 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| ISU @ IOWA | 7:30 | 30,903 | -13.5 | -14.5 | ISU | 56 | 50 | 26 | 37 | -1 | -1 | -0.5 | 14 | FINAL |
| MEM @ BOISE | 6:00 | 28,358 | -6.5 | -9.5 | MEM | 65 | 50 | 58 | 62 | -2.5 | -1 | -1 | — | 2.1 FINAL |
| WF @ PUR | 12:00 | 27,343 | 3.5 | 3 | PUR | 51 | 43 | 77 | 59 | -1.5 | +0.5 | 0 | — | 0.0 FINAL |
| PSU @ TEM | 12:00 | 23,779 | 23.5 | 24 | PSU | 82 | 24 | 89 | 90 | +1.5 | +0.5 | +0.5 | — | FINAL |
| CAL @ SYR | 3:30 | 23,441 | 2.5 | -3.5 | SYR | 53 | 62 | 48 | 60 | -5.5 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| DUKE @ ILL | 3:30 | 19,861 | -8.5 | -6.5 | ILL | 68 | 62 | 44 | 60 | +1.5 | -1 | -1 | — | FINAL |
| WKU @ UGA | 12:45 | 19,503 | -35.5 | -40.5 | WKU | 62 | 79 | 19 | 5 | -5 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| USF @ ARMY | 12:00 | 19,472 | -1.5 | -3.5 | USF | 70 | 75 | — | — | -2 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| ODU @ VT | 12:00 | 19,159 | -14 | -18.5 | VT | 79 | 20 | 73 | 87 | -2.5 | +1 | +0.5 | — | 0.0 FINAL |
| SDSU @ UCLA | 7:15 | 18,821 | -8.5 | -13.5 | UCLA | 70 | 76 | 81 | 84 | -3 | -1 | -1 | — | FINAL |
| LT @ LSU | 7:30 | 17,751 | -31.5 | -34.5 | LSU | 91 | 16 | 96 | 96 | -3 | +1 | +1 | — | 2.7 FINAL |
| UNLV @ UNT | 3:45 | 17,231 | 6.5 | 3 | UNLV | 51 | 63 | 47 | 65 | -3.5 | -0.5 | 0 | 3 | FINAL |
| TTU @ ORST | 7:30 | 16,701 | 29.5 | 25.5 | ORST | 61 | 50 | 48 | 34 | -2.5 | -1 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| NAVY @ FAU | 7:30 | 16,135 | 6.5 | 4 | NAVY | 61 | 72 | 72 | 78 | -2.5 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 4 | 2.5 FINAL |
| BGSU @ NEB | 7:00 | 15,989 | -25.5 | -30.5 | NEB | 73 | 9 | 88 | 83 | -5 | -1 | -0.5 | — | FINAL |
| UCF @ PITT | 3:30 | 14,464 | -8.5 | -7 | UCF | 52 | 46 | 10 | 16 | +1 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| APP @ ECU | 12:00 | 13,853 | -8.5 | -6.5 | APP | 54 | 51 | 75 | 47 | +3 | +0.5 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| WSU @ KSU | 12:00 | 12,798 | -18.5 | -17.5 | WSU | 84 | 84 | 41 | 41 | 0 | +2 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| CHA @ MISS | 7:45 | 12,551 | -46.5 | -45 | CHA | 85 | 87 | 42 | 14 | +1.5 | +2.5 | +0.5 | — | FINAL |
| USM @ AUB | 7:45 | 12,455 | -29.5 | -34.5 | USM | 81 | 92 | 6 | 21 | -5 | -1 | -2 | — | FINAL |
| BUFF @ FIU | 6:00 | 12,450 | -7.5 | -8.5 | BUFF | 70 | 50 | 75 | 41 | -1 | +2 | +2 | — | 1.3 FINAL |
| TLSA @ SHSU | 7:00 | 12,399 | 12.5 | 12.5 | TLSA | 66 | 68 | 63 | 66 | +1 | -1 | -1 | — | 3.0 FINAL |
| UTSA @ TXST | 3:30 | 12,318 | -1.5 | -2.5 | UTSA | 66 | 54 | — | — | -1 | -1 | -0.5 | 2 | unconfirmed FINAL |
| USA @ TULN | 7:00 | 10,920 | -10 | -9.5 | USA | 51 | 39 | 79 | 27 | +0.5 | 0 | +0.5 | — | FINAL |
| GAST @ KENN | 7:00 | 10,602 | -9.5 | -7.5 | GAST | 78 | 45 | 65 | 55 | +2 | +2 | +1 | — | FINAL |
| RICE @ ND | 3:30 | 9,789 | -44.5 | -44.5 | ND | 55 | 13 | 84 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| GASO @ CLEM | 7:30 | 9,693 | -26.5 | -19.5 | CLEM | 63 | 69 | 85 | 89 | +7 | +1 | 0 | — | 2.5 FINAL |
| DEL @ VAN | 4:15 | 9,239 | -23.5 | -20.5 | DEL | 58 | 54 | — | — | +1 | 0 | +0.5 | — | FINAL |
| UMD @ UCONN | 3:30 | 8,820 | 10.5 | 11.5 | UCONN | 61 | 84 | — | — | -1.5 | -1 | 0 | — | FINAL |
| USU @ WASH | 3:30 | 8,199 | -24.5 | -28 | WASH | 73 | 14 | 76 | 85 | -3.5 | -1.5 | -0.5 | — | FINAL |
| UCD @ SMU | 4:00 | 8,143 | -24.5 | -32.5 | SMU | 99 | 15 | 95 | 96 | -8 | -7.5 | -4 | — | FINAL |
Movement columns are the change in the home spread over each window. Teal = moved against the money (the signal); orange = moved with it. AN = Action Network consensus, DK = DraftKings. Percentages are for the side named in “Money on”.
How much to trust it
- Most days produce nothing, and that is the screen working. Thin markets are dropped before they are screened, both money feeds have to agree, and the line has to have moved against that money. A light board clears none of that: one recent Friday had four games and produced no pick at all. A screen that always finds something is not a screen.
- The edge is modest. The underlying move — reverse line movement — is a real but heavily degraded signal — books price it in now. This screen finds where a market is behaving oddly; it does not establish that the odd behaviour is wrong.
- Splits are a snapshot, not a history. Percentages are read at generation time and will drift before kickoff.
- Ticket shape can conflict. Where one feed shows money concentrated in few tickets and the other shows it spread across many, the sharp reading is weaker. The per-game cards show both so the disagreement stays visible.
- Totals move spreads. A falling total mechanically compresses a spread, so part of a spread move can be a total move wearing a disguise.
- Check the news. A line moving against the money is often just an injury the percentages have not caught up with yet.